For
years, even as the economy recovered and the stock market soared, most
American workers saw little evidence of better times in their paychecks.
But
last month’s surprisingly large increase in both average hourly and
weekly earnings, along with other encouraging data, has convinced many
economists that falling unemployment and increased hiring are finally
about to start paying off in terms of wage gains for a broader swath of
workers.
“It’s
the beginning of an uptick, and we should see it continue over the next
year or two as the unemployment rate falls and the labor market
tightens,” said Nariman Behravesh, chief economist at IHS, a private
economics and forecasting firm. “You have to be careful, but my gut
instinct is that this is the beginning of better wage performance.”
Still,
even the seemingly good news for wages in November wasn’t clear-cut.
Although overall wages increased 0.4 percent — double what economists
had been expecting — the gain for lower-paid workers in nonsupervisory
and production roles increased only 0.2 percent.
Just
how much the typical employee’s pay might go up in the months ahead —
and whether most workers will see significant gains or just a select few
— is a key question in the economic debate facing Wall Street,
academia, officials in the Obama administration and, especially, the Federal Reserve.
On
Tuesday and Wednesday, Fed policy makers will hold their final meeting
of the year, followed by a news conference from Janet L. Yellen, the Fed
chairwoman, where she is expected to provide further hints about when
the Fed will begin raising short-term interest rates after keeping them
near zero for the last six years.
The
nascent uptick in wages has prompted further warnings from the more
hawkish members of the Fed’s policy-making council who want the central
bank to start tightening monetary policy sooner, rather than later, to
ward off what they see as a potential threat of inflation.
But
Ms. Yellen and a majority of Fed policy makers, pointing to evidence
that inflation remains well under the central bank’s 2 percent target,
do not appear to be unduly alarmed and probably still prefer to leave
interest rates as low as possible until the trend is better established.
“Until
it is unambiguous, people can spin it any way they want,” said Ian
Shepherdson, chief economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics. “One month is a
curiosity, two months is interesting and three months is a trend.”
The
split at the Fed is echoed in Washington, primarily along partisan
lines. On Capitol Hill, some Republicans say it is time for the Fed to
act, while Democrats in the Obama administration, like Thomas E. Perez,
the labor secretary, say there is no rush.
“I
welcome the point when my first concern when I get out of bed in the
morning is having to address rapid wage growth,” Mr. Perez said. “I’m
not too worried about inflation.”
As
for the argument that the Fed needs to move sooner, rather than later,
Mr. Perez said he “couldn’t reject that in stronger terms.”
“It’s
time for the middle class and the aspiring middle class to share in the
dividends of their hard work,” he added. “The folks at the top end have
been doing great and our prosperity hasn’t been shared.”
By
contrast, Representative Kevin P. Brady, a Texas Republican who is
chairman of the Joint Economic Committee, has called on the Fed to move
quickly, but even some conservative economists say the plunge in energy
prices gives the central bank more flexibility this time around.
“Historically,
inflation is something that gets out of the box because the Fed moves
too slowly,” said Kevin A. Hassett, director of economic policy studies
at the American Enterprise Institute and a former Fed economist. “But
we’ve had a positive energy shock, so the Fed has ample room to wait and
see.”
In
just the last month, average gasoline prices have dropped by 25 cents,
to $2.77 a gallon nationally, according to the federal Energy
Information Administration, and more reductions are on the way as crude
oil prices continue to fall.
And if wages keep rising, the typical American family will have a couple of thousand more dollars to spend in 2015.
Extended
over the next year, November’s 0.4 percent increase in average hourly
earnings would equal an annual wage increase of nearly 5 percent, more
than double the 2.1 percent increase recorded over the last 12 months.
“If
the average is 2 percent, there are a lot of people getting next to
nothing,” Mr. Shepherdson said. “And 2 percent wage growth when
corporate profits are skyrocketing makes people very angry.”
But
before anyone strikes up “Happy Days Are Here Again,” Mr. Shepherdson
cautioned that a previous 0.4 percent rise in wages in June 2013 was
followed by no increase the next month. Similarly, the 0.4 percent gain
in October 2011 also showed no signs of staying power.
What
might be different this time, Mr. Shepherdson said, is that the rise in
average hourly earnings coincides with other positive data, including a
fall in jobless claims, a declining unemployment rate and healthy
hiring by private employers, as well as an increase in job openings.
On
Monday, the Federal Reserve reported that industrial production in the
United States rose by 1.1 percent in November, and also revised upward
the increase for October. Over all, the new data shows factory output in
the United States has finally exceeded its prerecession level.
Despite
the positive data recently, Fed policy makers have made clear that they
won’t act on rates this week, or at their next meeting in January, but
rather wait at least until March and more likely June 2015, at the
earliest, economists said.
One
possible development on Wednesday, when policy makers wrap up their
meeting, is that the Fed will tweak the language in its policy statement
and drop its reference to keep rates near zero “for a considerable
time.”
Although
optimists like Mr. Shepherdson and Mr. Behravesh say the wage gains
should become broader as unemployment continues to fall, professionals
on the front lines of the labor market say higher-paid, better-educated
workers with specialized skills are still getting the greater share of
raises right now.
“What
people want to see is 1999 or 2004, when companies were saying, ‘We’ll
hire anyone,’ ” said Tom Gimbel, chief executive of LaSalle Network, a
Chicago staffing firm. “That’s not what’s happening now.”
Instead,
Mr. Gimbel said, salaries are rising in sectors in which experienced
workers are harder to find, like technology, finance and higher-level
accounting positions, and where salaries tend to be at least $80,000 or
more.
For
recent college graduates with liberal arts degrees, or workers in call
centers and in data processing jobs, where yearly wages are less than
$50,000, Mr. Gimbel said, “we’re bringing people in at the same salary
as 10 years ago.”
Mr.
Gimbel added that new college graduates were still willing to take jobs
they might have rejected in the past, like working in a call center.
“They
figure, “The sooner I get a job, the quicker I can start paying off a
mountain of student debt,’ ” he said. “And for guys working as a
lifeguard or in the gym, a call center is white-collar experience.”
No comments: